Poll skip map box

[brookesxx]

Like the improve layout - mentioning not enough votes yet and clearer text.

Could I suggest also putting instructions e.g. press Page Up or Page Down to vote Yes/No somewhere. Or even just type !Vote Yes etc.

I don’t think all players know how to vote. So an extra line may help.

thanks for keeping the game alive.

[ExEric3]

Keybinds can be modified so its user setting. How to vote is displayed in a chat.

<RCAOW> Host: [RC] A poll has just started to add time limit for the current map. You have 30 seconds to vote "!yes" or "!no".

 

[iK4l3l]

great improvement..

another suggestion, need 60% voting for poll to be counted, can we add the percentage of total votes (yes and no), so we can see how close we are to %60 voting?

[ExEric3]

1 hour ago, iK4l3l said:

great improvement..

another suggestion, need 60% voting for poll to be counted, can we add the percentage of total votes (yes and no), so we can see how close we are to %60 voting?

learn to read u have it there as text.

[iK4l3l]

2 hours ago, ExEric3 said:

learn to read u have it there as text.

i saw its showing percentage of yes and no separately..

i mean percentage of "yes and no" votes among all players..

if that is shown already, sorry i didnt notice lol..

[Xylaquin]

I don't think it's a case of people don't know how to vote, it's hard to miss the poll box! But the 60% requirement to pass, and the lack of enforcement to vote has created a culture where people spam DO NOT VOTE in the chat feed when they want the result to be no.

Proposed system:

• For the first 20 seconds, the poll mechanism should remain as it is.
• But if after 20 seconds a player still hasn't cast a vote, force them to in the last 10 seconds.
• If a player ignores the forced vote, kick them.

We need to appreciate that some players can't immediately vote because they're in the middle of a fight, planting a beacon, rushing into a building or doing something that they need to prioritise. That's why immediately forcing a vote for everyone is a bad idea. However the above system, which only forces it on people who haven't voted after 20 seconds, ensures that players who are genuinely busy can finish what they're doing, and ensures that everyone votes so that a conclusive result is always achieved.

[Goztow]

You can't kick people for not voting... 

[Itai795]

Yea, we are not Belgium

[MarcPoulet]

That's an idea but I can hear Solidgold 500 miles from here yelling about the forces vote because ge didn't notice or cared about Fr3nzy 10th poll to remove the timer

[Xylaquin]

9 hours ago, Goztow said:

You can't kick people for not voting... 

Why not? They had 20 seconds to vote, if they can't get a split second in that time then they're forced. And if they don't vote in the forced, then that means they're either AFK or being uncooperative. Kicking people that don't vote even when forced would purge the server of AFKers and pests.

7 hours ago, MarcPoulet said:

That's an idea but I can hear Solidgold 500 miles from here yelling about the forces vote because ge didn't notice or cared about Fr3nzy 10th poll to remove the timer

lol, that's another benefit of my proposition: by ensuring everyone votes the vote is conclusive, the playerbase has spoken, so Fr3nzy will have to put up with whatever the result is.

[Goztow]

We already have a force vote which pauzes the game and enforces the result of a vote. This seems a more appropriate way of forcing people to vote than getting rid of our player base.