mdogg1108 Posted December 28, 2016 Posted December 28, 2016 I was thinking... can we add C&C_City to the rotation? I don't remember if it was ever on there, and I think it would be interesting to see how the dynamic changes from C&C_City_Flying. I can't recall the last time I played City without helis. Walls Flying and Walls are completely different types of gameplay, what about City vs City Flying? Thoughts?
Joetorp Posted December 28, 2016 Posted December 28, 2016 15 minutes ago, mdogg1108 said: Walls Flying and Walls are completely different types of gameplay, Thoughts? Substitute City for Walls!
Manuel857 Posted December 28, 2016 Posted December 28, 2016 2 citys on the rotation? hell naww City Flying > City.
mdogg1108 Posted December 28, 2016 Author Posted December 28, 2016 The rotation currently has Walls Flying and Walls. Whats wrong with an extra City? :)
Redst3r Posted December 28, 2016 Posted December 28, 2016 I approve this. I like City. Its a nice map :)
dippy Posted December 28, 2016 Posted December 28, 2016 I like this idea. City_Flying is my favourite map, even if it is a little one sided. City would be interesting to play. Let's trial it at least!
u00fzTar Posted December 28, 2016 Posted December 28, 2016 3 hours ago, Joetorp said: Substitute City for Walls! Substitute City for Creekdale_Flying? :D As a substitution or an additive map, lets play City! 1
ChriS Posted December 28, 2016 Posted December 28, 2016 2 hours ago, u00fzTar said: Substitute City for Creekdale_Flying? :D Yes!! Remove Creekdale, it makes so many people leav and there are so many bugs in it. 3
Guest rackz Posted December 28, 2016 Posted December 28, 2016 City_flying 1:0 Creekdale more vanilla plz
YesNoMayb Posted December 28, 2016 Posted December 28, 2016 I don't see why we can have both walls and walls_flying and not city and city_flying. Get rid of creekdale and add metropolis or metro. Fuck the impenetrable bushes and the map is sniperville.
mdogg1108 Posted December 28, 2016 Author Posted December 28, 2016 I agree with replacing Creekdale with City. 1
ehh Posted December 28, 2016 Posted December 28, 2016 1 hour ago, YesNoMayb said: I don't see why we can have both walls and walls_flying and not city and city_flying. Get rid of creekdale and add metropolis or metro. Fuck the impenetrable bushes and the map is sniperville. because people enjoy walls and walls flying city stinks
Manuel857 Posted December 28, 2016 Posted December 28, 2016 17 hours ago, Manuel857 said: 2 citys on the rotation? hell naww City Flying > City. NVM, I take that back. I wouldn't mind replacing Creekdale with city. 1
mdogg1108 Posted December 29, 2016 Author Posted December 29, 2016 Some conclusions from today's replacement of Creekdale_Flying with C&C_City (ground). -It took 55 minutes for a building to die. It was the Power Plant and Refinery via stank rush. -City Flying is generally a heavy Nod map, however GDI put up a very great fight on City ground. It was extremely difficult to get that stank rush to work. I think not having the helicopters really allow MRLS and Arty's to be more useful. Overall, I think it made it more even as opposed to flying (although I personally love flying as well). -The game ended in approximately 1 hour and 2 minutes. The longer the map, the more players the server gets. Creekdale seems to get skipped a lot regardless. Bias aside, I think people enjoyed City more than Creekdale, seeing as no one complained to skip it lol. 2
NeoNBreeze Posted December 29, 2016 Posted December 29, 2016 Me and a few of the OS guys played in this City last night and totally agree, it's definitely worth keeping in the rotation. It provided possibly some of the best tank battles i've seen in this server the past few months, I think about 15v15 to 18v18 were in the server at the time so a good amount of people. Also - Have you thought about adding some other lesser known, but genuinely good strategic maps, that I'm sure many of you have played on back in the day. Such as: Cairo Tropics Terrace Ruins Siege FieldTS Hangmans Canyon Thoughts...? :)
u00fzTar Posted December 29, 2016 Posted December 29, 2016 (edited) 3 hours ago, NeoNBreeze said: Also - Have you thought about adding some other lesser known, but genuinely good strategic maps, that I'm sure many of you have played on back in the day. Such as: Cairo [...] Siege I guess Cairo would be something totally new and exciting experience for many player ( like me^^) 3 AGTs / Obelisks , 2 power plants and lots of space. On the other side it reminds me of the huge imperial MPF maps. Don't like those, but that's perhaps more because the Imperial Mode.. Siege, who dont like it? Awesome map Also an option: Niagra(!), Metropolis Get rid of: Creekdale, Bio (it lasted so long in rotation now), and maybe BunkersTS Edited December 29, 2016 by u00fzTar grammar
Redst3r Posted December 29, 2016 Posted December 29, 2016 I don't agree with replacing it with Creekdale. Am I the only one who likes Creekdale? :P
ChriS Posted December 29, 2016 Posted December 29, 2016 (edited) 3 hours ago, Redst3r said: I don't agree with replacing it with Creekdale. Am I the only one who likes Creekdale? :P yes you'r the only one Edited December 29, 2016 by Protos
ice187dna Posted December 29, 2016 Posted December 29, 2016 Used to love playing Cairo. When I played back in the days we actually had some really good tank battles and the side which works together wins together. Perhaps maybe have poll/vote for the nominated maps?
BeerBaron Posted December 29, 2016 Posted December 29, 2016 GDI does alot better on City w/o flying, im down.
mdogg1108 Posted December 29, 2016 Author Posted December 29, 2016 I think we should just keep this thread to City and put all your other maps I hate somewhere else 1
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now